Feature Photograph
Feature Photograph
  Feature Photograph

Bespoke Assessment Design

CompAssess has developed an extensive library of assessment exercises from which to draw. These exercises form the back bone of most our assessment solutions.

Our proven expertise in assessment design has also equipped us with the capability to develop bespoke assessment designs for our clients, applying the same development rigour that applies to the development of CompAssess designs.

The CompAssess Design Process

Our approach to assessment design is to ensure a clear separation of roles between assessment design and reviewing and critiquing. In our experience this ensures efficient project management and the highest quality output.

The CompAssess assessment design process operates as follows.

» Click here to view assessment design process diagram.

  1. Review Target Behaviours
    The first step in assessment design process is a thorough review of the targeted competencies and associated definitions, and behavioural indicators.

    From this we are able to complete a draft competency coverage grid, showing the link between each competency and planned exercise, as well as demonstrating that each competency is well covered by appropriate assessment exercises
  2. Scenario Development
    The next step in the CompAssess design process is to generate face valid and content valid scenarios that will provide realistic stimuli and triggers for the targeted behavioural indicators.

    CompAssess then 'pressure tests' the scenarios to ensure that they will provide sufficient stimuli for participants to demonstrate all the required behavioural indicators for each competency.

    The culmination of this step is a brief synopsis of the exercise scenarios, supported by notes detailing the contextual behaviours that will be stimulated against each of the behavioural indicators.

    These provide the context or background for each exercise.


  3. Draft Exercise Design
    Our assessment design team drafts the content for each exercise before submitting them for scrutiny.

    This process may be partially iterative with the design team making adjustments and amendments as requested until all parties agree the exercise is ready for piloting.


  4. Assessment Material Development
    This important step guides the preparation of the additional assessment material that requires drafting before the exercise may be piloted.

    Assessment materials requiring drafting at this step include:
    • Background Notes
      These provide the context for the design and in some instances are provided to participants a week prior to a assessment/development centre. They set the scene for the role the participant is adopting and provide background information on the fictitious organisation the participant will 'work for' for the duration of the assessment centre.


    • Role-player Instructions (where appropriate)
      Role-player instructions provide succinct guidance regarding the behavioural indicators that are being targeted by the exercise, details of the roles being played in the exercise, general guidance on how to role-play effectively and exercise-specific guidance as to how to respond effectively in the different situations that may arise within the given scenario, depending on the approach taken by the participant.


    • Participant Instructions
      Participant instructions provide all the required information for the participant to successfully complete the exercise. Obviously, this information is exercise specific and differs depending on the exercise format.
    • Evaluation Forms
      Exercise specific evaluation forms are developed, guiding the assessors by detailing the effective and ineffective behaviours that may be displayed against each of the competency behavioural indicators.
    • Assessor Notes
      CompAssess also develops supplementary assessor notes, as a companion to the evaluation forms. Well designed and exercise specific evaluation forms reduce the reliance on assessor notes. We do, however, provide additional background information, and more extensive detail regarding the range of possible approaches that may be taken by a participant in each exercise and guidance as to how assess each approach.


    All the above documentation is reviewed, critiqued and approved before moving forward to piloting.


  5. Piloting, Editing and Calibration

    The Piloting Process

    The piloting of exercises represents a critical step in the assessment design process.

    Our approach is to pilot all exercises internally before presenting them for final review, minimising the probability of exercise failure or the need for substantial re-work.

    We pilot each exercise with a "naive" participant, that is, one who has had no previous exposure to any of the assessment materials. The role-playing and assessing is completed by individuals who have not been previously involved in the project, and who therefore bring no vested design interest and less subjectivity to the pilot.

    Editing

    On completion of the piloting process, adjustments and edits are completed.

    Calibration

    Where parallel exercises are required, the calibration of the exercises for equal opportunity to demonstrate target behavioural indicators and degree of difficulty is critical.

    Calibration of exercises is measured in three key areas:
    • Face validity - perceptions of difficulty and comparability
    • Reliability - comparable levels of rater accuracy in the assessment process
    • Performance - comparable levels of degree of difficulty, such that a participant will achieve the same score irrespective of which exercise they complete

    Our approach to determining the comparability and inter-changeability of parallel exercises is to pilot them as previously discussed but with the same participant applying the same effort in both exercises.

    The debrief process then covers:

    • Participant reactions to different exercise content, with an emphasis on any differences between the two
    • Assessor reactions to usability of assessor evaluation forms and notes for both exercises, with an emphasis on any differences between the two
    • Inter-rater reliabilities on both exercises, with an emphasis on where there are discrepancies and why
    • Differing participant performance across the two exercises, with an emphasis on understanding the differences between the two performances, and any associated disparities in opportunities to demonstrate effective behaviour against the target behavioural indicators.


  6. Finalisation of Materials / Assessor Training

    The final step in the process is to complete a proof of the documentation for presentation and typographical errors before dispatching the materials for printing.

    If applicable, an Assessor Training session also takes place. This is most important in order to ensure the CompAssess and/or client assessors are familiar with the exercises, their role as assessors/role players and are able to conduct accurate evaluations of the exercises. Data integration and feedback to participants is also canvassed through assessor training.

» View Client Case Study

» Contact CompAssess to learn more about our Assessment Design Services.

More Information
To find out more about this topic please contact us.
» Click here for more info
Case Study
View a Client Case Study relating to Bespoke Assessment Design.
» Read More